Thursday, 11 October 2012

ROSTCHILD THEORY


House of Saud used by the Rothschilds to divide Muslims and secure the state of Israel


http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/fahad.jpg?w=627
Prince Abdullah Bin Fahad Al-Saud----there's certainly something obscure about the origins and ethnicity of Saudi royalty

As outlined in articles by Peter Goodgame, The Globalists and the Islamists, the Jewish elite have had a hand in forming and financing all of the so-called “terrorist organizations” of the twentieth century, including the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Hamas of Palestine, and the Afghan Mujahideen. But according to the following article by David Livingstone, the leading Jews’ duplicity of that sort dates back further, to the eighteenth century, when judaized British Freemasons conspired to create the Wahhabi sect in Saudi Arabia, to divide Islam, and provide a geopolitical advantage for a new state of Israel, and by that further foster the elite Jews’ global takeover agenda.

http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/ibn-saud-and-william-a-eddy1.jpg?w=627
Ibn Saud and William A. Eddy

“That a British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for shaping of the extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a Turkish work, Mir’at al-Haramain, by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-1938. British policy in its colonies often involved the creation of deviant sects, in order to Divide and Conquer, as was the case with the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the nineteenth century.
The details of this conspiracy are outlined in a little known document by the name of The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher published in series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel, and later in a prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English and other languages.
The document is a first-hand account by Hempher of his mission for his government, which sent him to the Middle East to discover ways to undermine the Ottoman Empire. Among the vices the British were to promote were racism and nationalism, alcohol, gambling, fornication and tempting Muslim women to uncover themselves.

http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/kingabdul_aziz.jpg?w=627
King Abdul Aziz on board the USS Quincy

But most important was the strategy to “insert heresies into Muslims’ creedal tenets and then criticize Islam for being a religion of terror.” To this purpose, Hempher located a particularly corrupt individual by the name of Mohammed Ibn Adbul Wahhab.
To understand the brand of fanaticism that Wahhabism inculcated, it is first necessary to recognize that Islam called upon all Muslims, regardless of their race or nationality, to see themselves as brothers in faith. The killing of another Muslim was strictly forbidden.
However, as part of their strategy of Divide and Conquer, the British hoped to pit the Arab Muslims against their Turkish brothers. The only way to do so was to find a loophole in Islamic law whereby the Arabs could declare the Turks as apostates.

http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/ibn-saud-and-faisal-of-iraq-with-zionists-on-board-the-lauren-in-1949.jpg?w=627
Ibn Saud and Faisal of Iraq with Zionists on board the Lauren in 1949

Abdul Wahhab was the instrument by which the British were able to insinuate this vile idea into the Muslims of the Arabian Peninsula. Basically, Wahhab contrived the idea that, simply by the trivial act of offering prayers to saints, their Turkish brethren had forfeited their faith, and therefore, that it was permitted to kill all who refused to adhere to his reforms, and to enslave their women and children. But that included the entire Muslim world, except for his small misguided band of followers.
But the Wahhabi movement was insignificant without the allegiance of the Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from Jewish merchants from Iraq. Orthodox jurists of the time branded the Wahhabis as heretics and condemned their fanaticism and intolerance. Nevertheless, the Wahhabis then demonstrated their contempt for their pretended faith by indiscriminately slaughtering Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The Wahhabis then set about destroying all the holy tombs and burial grounds. They stole the Prophet’s treasure, which included holy books, works of art and innumerable priceless gifts sent to the city during the previous thousand years. The leather and gilt bindings of the Islamic holy books they had destroyed were used to make sandals for the Wahhabi criminals.
The Ottoman Sultan brought an end to the first Wahhabi rebellion in 1818, but the sect revived under the leadership of the Saudi Faysal I. The movement was then somewhat restored until once again destroyed at the end of the nineteenth century.

http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/left-abd-al-aziz-ibn-saud-seated-with-other-male-members-of-his-family-1911.jpg?w=627
To the left abd al-aziz ibn-saud seated with other male members of his family in 1911

After WWI, the former regions of the Ottoman Empire were divided into varying puppets’ regimes. For aiding to undermine the Ottoman authority in the region, Ibn Saud was duly rewarded with the creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932. One year later, in 1933, the Saudis granted oil concessions to California Arabian Standard Oil Company (Casoc), affiliate of Standard Oil of California (Socal, today’s Chevron), headed by Rothschild agent, and chief among [US so-called] Illuminati families, John D. Rockefeller. Since that time, Saudi Arabia has been the most important ally to the West in the Middle East, not only providing ready access to its plentiful oil reserves, but also in tempering Arab aggression against Israel. Due to the evident hypocrisy of the regime, it has been necessary to suppress the ensuing dissent with brutality. Another important aspect has been preventing scholars from speaking of “politics”, that is, to criticize the regime.
http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/king-faisal_1_dtb6w_19672.jpg?w=627
King Faisal of Saudi Arabia took the throne in 1964

In The Two Faces of Islam, Stephen Schwartz writes, “Their tastes led them to taverns, casinos, brothels … They bought fleets of automobiles, private jets, and yachts the size of warships. They invested in valuable Western art they did not understand or like and which often offended the sensitivities of Wahhabi clerics. They spent as they wished, becoming patrons of international sexual enslavement and the exploitation of children.”
The result has been that, in order to nonetheless appear to be espousing Islam, the Saudi regime and its puppet scholars have evolved a version of Islam that emphasizes ceremonial details of the religion, at the expense of helping to understand broader political realities. Their manner has encouraged a literal interpretation of Islamic law, permitting the likes of bin Laden to exploit the Koran to justify the killing of innocents.

http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/saudi-king-wheelchair.jpg?w=627
King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud

Ultimately, the profusion of Rothschild financed petro-dollars in the coffers of the Saudi family has made it possible for them to propagandize their bastardized version of Islam to other parts of the world, most notably to America, where they purportedly subsidize up to 80 percent of the mosques in the country, a version of Islam that substitutes political awareness for dogmatic insistence on ritualistic fanaticism.
http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/45064_6.jpg?w=627
Hillary beaming like a Cheshire cat in the presence of the Saudi King and his display of wealth
http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/4989396772_54436fcdbf_z.jpg?w=627

The Saudis have still got America over an (oil) barrel …
Brokeback Bush — a love affair with Saudi Oil …

http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/sillegitimatekids.jpg?w=627

Posted by Simon Gibson 

No comments: